1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 8,192 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 80 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Because 1963 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1973 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | 62 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 8192 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 223 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 101 L |
