1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1975 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1975 Triumph 2000 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 810 kg more than 1975 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1975 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | 62 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2700 mm |
