1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 14 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Cadillac | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 62 | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 1963 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2154 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 107 L |