1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1980 Mercedes-Benz 380
To start off, 1980 Mercedes-Benz 380 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mercedes-Benz 380 (218 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mercedes-Benz 380 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 530 kg more than 1980 Mercedes-Benz 380.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1980 Mercedes-Benz 380 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | 380 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3818 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 71.8 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 90 L |