1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1981 Ford Granada
To start off, 1981 Ford Granada is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1981 Ford Granada. (68 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1981 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 720 kg more than 1981 Ford Granada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1981 Ford Granada | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Granada |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 68 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 94.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 90 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2780 mm |
