1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1982 Honda Ballade
To start off, 1982 Honda Ballade is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1982 Honda Ballade. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1982 Honda Ballade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1305 kg more than 1982 Honda Ballade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1982 Honda Ballade | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | Ballade |
Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1335 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 67 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2330 mm |