1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1982 Plymouth Caravelle
To start off, 1982 Plymouth Caravelle is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 900 kg more than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1982 Plymouth Caravelle | |
Make | Cadillac | Plymouth |
Model | 62 | Caravelle |
Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2630 mm |