1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1985 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1985 Jaguar XJR is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,500 cc (12 cylinders), 1985 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1195 kg more than 1985 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1985 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | 62 | XJR |
Year Released | 1963 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 6500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 671 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 90 L |