1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1986 Ford Granada
To start off, 1986 Ford Granada is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 834 kg more than 1986 Ford Granada.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1986 Ford Granada | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Granada |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1306 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 116 L |
