1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1986 Volvo 740
To start off, 1986 Volvo 740 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1986 Volvo 740. (156 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1986 Volvo 740. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1986 Volvo 740. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1986 Volvo 740 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | 740 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2780 mm |