1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1988 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 1988 Jaguar XJS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Jaguar XJS (225 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 460 kg more than 1988 Jaguar XJS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1988 Jaguar XJS | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | 62 | XJS |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 92 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1220 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 90 L |
