1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1989 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1989 Ford Ranger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1989 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1989 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1963 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4690 mm |