1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1989 Lada Samara
To start off, 1989 Lada Samara is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1989 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1989 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1989 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1989 Lada Samara | |
Make | Cadillac | Lada |
Model | 62 | Samara |
Year Released | 1963 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1288 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2470 mm |