1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112
To start off, 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 (402 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 540 kg more than 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | C 112 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 5987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 402 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 100 L |
