1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1992 Mazda 323
To start off, 1992 Mazda 323 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 910 kg more than 1992 Mazda 323.
Because 1992 Mazda 323 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 323 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1992 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | 323 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1840 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |
