1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1994 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 1994 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1994 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 1994 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1994 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Astro |
Year Released | 1963 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 183 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2830 mm |