1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1995 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1995 Chevrolet Suburban. (187 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1995 Chevrolet Suburban. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 55 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1995 Chevrolet Suburban | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | 62 | Suburban |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 5731 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 9 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 2145 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3350 mm |
