1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 874 kg more than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1963 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 124 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1266 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2210 mm |