1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Daewoo Brougham
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Brougham is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Brougham. (109 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 790 kg more than 1996 Daewoo Brougham. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Daewoo Brougham | |
Make | Cadillac | Daewoo |
Model | 62 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |