1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Dodge Ram
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 993 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | 62 | Ram |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3530 mm |