1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1996 Ford Taurus is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Taurus (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 572 kg more than 1996 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1518 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2760 mm |
