1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1996 Jaguar XK is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 390 kg more than 1996 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | 62 | XK |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 75 L |