1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL (375 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | SL |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 5956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 375 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 94.8 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 80 L |