1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Suzuki Samurai
To start off, 1996 Suzuki Samurai is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1125 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Samurai.
Because 1996 Suzuki Samurai is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Suzuki Samurai will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Suzuki Samurai | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | 62 | Samurai |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 69 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2490 mm |
