1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Volvo V70
To start off, 1996 Volvo V70 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1996 Volvo V70. (193 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo V70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 686 kg more than 1996 Volvo V70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | V70 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1404 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |