1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Ford Maverick
To start off, 1997 Ford Maverick is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1997 Ford Maverick.
Because 1997 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Ford Maverick | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Maverick |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1860 mm |
