1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 1998 Dodge Dakota is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 610 kg more than 1998 Dodge Dakota.
Because 1998 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | 62 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1963 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2850 mm |