1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Ford F-250
To start off, 1998 Ford F-250 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford F-250 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Because 1998 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | F-250 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 256 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 2350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3490 mm |