1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 62 | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2730 mm |
