1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Peugeot Tulip
To start off, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1175 kg more than 1998 Peugeot Tulip.
Because 1963 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Peugeot Tulip | |
| Make | Cadillac | Peugeot |
| Model | 62 | Tulip |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 880 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 45 L |
