1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (58 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1210 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | 62 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 58 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 50 L |
