1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Toyota Camry
To start off, 1998 Toyota Camry is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1998 Toyota Camry. (126 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1998 Toyota Camry. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 715 kg more than 1998 Toyota Camry. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Camry |
Year Released | 1963 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |