1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Chrysler 300
To start off, 1999 Chrysler 300 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chrysler 300 (251 HP @ 6450 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 490 kg more than 1999 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Chrysler 300 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | 62 | 300 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3517 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6450 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 100 L |
