1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Ford Fiesta
To start off, 1999 Ford Fiesta is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1999 Ford Fiesta. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Fiesta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1114 kg more than 1999 Ford Fiesta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Ford Fiesta | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Fiesta |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 81.4 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 976 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 40 L |
