1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1999 Honda CR-V is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1999 Honda CR-V. (148 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1999 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 590 kg more than 1999 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1745 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |