1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 1999 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1999 Mahindra Bolero.
Because 1999 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Mahindra Bolero | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mahindra |
| Model | 62 | Bolero |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2522 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1780 kg |
