1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Rover 75
To start off, 1999 Rover 75 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1999 Rover 75. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1999 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 700 kg more than 1999 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Rover 75 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | 62 | 75 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2750 mm |