1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Chevrolet S-10
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet S-10 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 670 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet S-10.
Because 2000 Chevrolet S-10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet S-10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Chevrolet S-10 | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | S-10 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3130 mm |