1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer (275 HP) has 78 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer weights approximately 70 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Trailblazer |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 275 HP |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 2160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2880 mm |