1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Holden Vectra
To start off, 2000 Holden Vectra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2000 Holden Vectra. (140 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 Holden Vectra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 790 kg more than 2000 Holden Vectra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Holden Vectra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | 62 | Vectra |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2650 mm |
