1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 TVR Tuscan
To start off, 2000 TVR Tuscan is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 965 kg more than 2000 TVR Tuscan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2000 TVR Tuscan | |
Make | Cadillac | TVR |
Model | 62 | Tuscan |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 58 L |