1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Ford 49
To start off, 2001 Ford 49 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 757 kg more than 2001 Ford 49.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Ford 49 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | 49 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3899 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1298 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |