1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 25 kg more than 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK.
Because 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Mercedes-Benz GLK | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | GLK |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2115 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2860 mm |