1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Dodge Intrepid
To start off, 2002 Dodge Intrepid is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 518 kg more than 2002 Dodge Intrepid.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Dodge Intrepid | |
| Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
| Model | 62 | Intrepid |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2736 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 78 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1572 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2880 mm |
