1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Ford Escape
To start off, 2002 Ford Escape is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2002 Ford Escape. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Escape. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 620 kg more than 2002 Ford Escape. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Ford Escape | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Escape |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 59 L |