1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Honda Civic
To start off, 2002 Honda Civic is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2002 Honda Civic. (157 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Civic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 826 kg more than 2002 Honda Civic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Honda Civic | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | 62 | Civic |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 157 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 86 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1264 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 50 L |
