1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Kia Pregio
To start off, 2002 Kia Pregio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2002 Kia Pregio. (81 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Pregio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 390 kg more than 2002 Kia Pregio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Kia Pregio | |
| Make | Cadillac | Kia |
| Model | 62 | Pregio |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2665 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4150 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2590 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 65 L |
