1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Lincoln Blackwood
To start off, 2002 Lincoln Blackwood is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lincoln Blackwood weights approximately 380 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Because 2002 Lincoln Blackwood is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Blackwood will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Lincoln Blackwood | |
Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
Model | 62 | Blackwood |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 5398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3530 mm |