1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 127 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1350 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Cadillac | MCC |
| Model | 62 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 1810 mm |
