1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 190 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Suburban |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 5327 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 117 L |